Propaganda and persuasion techniques
Propaganda techniques are ways of shaping what people believe without giving them good reasons: charged words, appeals to fear or loyalty, selective facts and constant repetition. Knowing their names makes them easier to notice, in the news, in advertising and in your own writing.
In-depth guides
Appeal to fear
An appeal to fear builds support for an idea by making the audience afraid of what will happen otherwise, often exaggerating the threat or offering no evidence for it.
Appeal to pity
An appeal to pity seeks agreement by evoking sympathy, guilt or compassion instead of giving reasons relevant to the claim.
Card stacking
Card stacking presents only the facts that support one side and leaves out those that do not, giving a distorted overall picture.
Casting doubt
Casting doubt questions the credibility of a person, institution or finding without giving grounds, to make the audience distrust it.
Causal oversimplification
Causal oversimplification attributes an outcome to a single cause when it has several.
Exaggeration and minimisation
Exaggeration and minimisation represent something as much larger or much smaller than it really is, to make it seem more or less important.
Firehose of falsehood
The firehose of falsehood floods channels with a high volume of messages, many false or contradictory, faster than they can be checked.
Flag-waving
Flag-waving justifies an action or idea by appealing to patriotism, national identity or group loyalty instead of evidence.
Framing
Framing presents an issue through a chosen perspective, emphasising some aspects and hiding others, so that one conclusion seems natural.
Gaslighting
Gaslighting makes people doubt their own memory, perception or judgement by persistently denying facts they have witnessed.
Glittering generalities
Glittering generalities attach vague, attractive words such as freedom, democracy or the future to an idea so that it is accepted without examination.
Half-truth
A half-truth is a statement that is literally true but leaves out information in a way that creates a false impression.
Information overload
Information overload buries the important facts under so much detail that the audience cannot separate what matters from what does not.
Intentional vagueness
Intentional vagueness uses deliberately unclear language so that the audience reads in what it wants and the speaker cannot be pinned down.
Loaded language
Loaded language uses words with strong emotional connotations to influence the audience, so that a judgement is delivered by the wording rather than argued for.
Name calling
Name calling attaches a negative label to a person, group or idea so that the audience rejects it without examining it.
Quoting out of context
Quoting out of context removes words from their surroundings so that they appear to mean something different from what the speaker intended.
Repetition
Repetition makes a claim persuasive by stating it again and again, regardless of evidence.
Scapegoating
Scapegoating blames a person or group for a complex problem, usually one they did not cause or caused only in part.
Slogans
A slogan is a brief, memorable phrase that packs a position into a few words, persuading through rhythm and repetition rather than argument.
Stereotyping
Stereotyping attributes fixed traits to everyone in a group, so that individuals are judged by the group label instead of by what they say or do.
Thought-terminating cliché
A thought-terminating cliché is a short, familiar phrase used to end a discussion and discourage further thought.
Us versus them
Us-versus-them framing divides people into a virtuous in-group and a threatening out-group, so that loyalty decides which claims are accepted.
Whataboutism
Whataboutism answers a criticism by pointing to someone else's wrongdoing instead of addressing the criticism itself.
Full reference list
89 techniques with a one-line summary.
- Ad Hominem
- Attacks the person making the argument.
- Ad Nauseam
- Repeatedly presents a message to increase familiarity.
- Agenda Setting
- News media influencing the importance of public agenda topics through frequent coverage.
- Appeal to Fear
- Creates anxiety by warning of negative consequences.
- Appeal to Grievance
- Recites past injuries or humiliations to justify present hostility or policy.
- Appeal to Pity
- Elicits sympathy to gain support.
- Appeal to Prejudice
- Exploits existing biases and prejudices.
- Artificial Dichotomy
- Presents only two options as if they were the only possibilities.
- Bandwagon
- Encourages adoption because "everyone else is doing it."
- Beautiful People
- Using famous or attractive people to suggest happiness or success with a product or ideology.
- Big Lie
- Repeated articulation of events with elements of truth to supplant accurate perceptions.
- Black-and-white Fallacy
- Presenting only two choices, with the propagated idea as the better option.
- Card Stacking
- Presents only favorable information, omitting negative aspects.
- Causal Oversimplification
- Assumes a single cause for an outcome that has several.
- Classical Conditioning
- Associating A with B to elicit physical reaction when A is presented alone.
- Cognitive Dissonance
- Exploiting desire for consistency, e.g., using actor's endorsement to change minds.
- Conspiracy Claim
- Attributes events to secret coordination by a hidden group without verifiable evidence.
- Cult of Personality
- Creating idealized heroic image via mass media to promote desired positions.
- Deification
- Presents an idea or person as holy or sacred.
- Demonizing the Enemy
- Making opponents appear subhuman or immoral through suggestion or false accusations.
- Demoralization
- Eroding fighting spirit to encourage surrender or defection.
- Dictat
- Simplifying decisions by telling audience exact actions, using authority figures.
- Disinformation
- Creating or deleting information to make false records, including forgery of media.
- Divide and Rule
- Gaining power by breaking larger concentrations into less powerful pieces.
- Door-in-the-face Technique
- Increasing acceptance by first offering a higher price, then reducing it.
- Doubt
- Questions the credibility of someone or something without giving grounds.
- Dysphemism
- Using negative connotation expressions, opposite of euphemism.
- Euphemism
- Using innocuous words to replace offensive or unpleasant ones.
- Euphoria
- Using events generating happiness to boost morale, e.g., declaring holidays.
- Exaggeration
- Stretching truth to make something appear more powerful.
- False Accusations
- Claiming wrongdoing unsupported by facts.
- False and Misleading Information
- Presents untrue statements as facts.
- Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD)
- Disseminating negative, dubious information to undermine credibility.
- Firehose of Falsehood
- Broadcasting rapid, repetitive, continuous messages over multiple channels without regard for truth.
- Flag-waving
- Justifying actions as patriotic, potentially omitting rational examination.
- Flak
- Efforts to discredit organizations or individuals disagreeing with prevailing assumptions.
- Foot-in-the-door Technique
- Gaining small favor first to create psychological debt, then asking for larger favor.
- Framing
- Social construction of phenomena by media or leaders to influence perception of meanings.
- Gaslighting
- Using denial, misdirection, and lying to sow doubt in target's memory or sanity.
- Gish Gallop
- Bombarding opponent with complex questions rapidly to make them appear uninformed.
- Glittering Generalities
- Employs vague, emotionally appealing words without concrete meaning.
- Guilt by Association
- Discrediting by suggesting idea is popular with hated groups.
- Half-truth
- Deceptive statement including some truth.
- Information Overload
- Overwhelming with information to reduce decision quality, prompt disengagement.
- Intentional Vagueness
- Deliberately vague generalities for audience to interpret, forgoing judgment.
- Labeling
- Using euphemism to increase or dysphemism to diminish perceived quality.
- Latitudes of Acceptance
- Techniques to increase acceptance bounds, e.g., taking extreme position first.
- Limited Hangout
- Admitting some truth while withholding key damaging facts when cover is shredded.
- Loaded Language
- Uses words with strong positive or negative connotations.
- Love Bombing
- Cutting off social support and bombarding with affection to isolate and recruit to cult or ideology.
- Lying and Deception
- Basis for techniques like Ad Hominem, Big Lie, involving dishonesty.
- Managing the News
- Confining to few points and repeating, consistent with classical conditioning.
- Milieu Control
- Controlling social environment and ideas through social pressure.
- Minimisation
- Deception involving denial and rationalization, opposite of exaggeration.
- Missing Information
- Intentionally leaves out negative or contradictory details.
- Modeling
- Learning through imitation, e.g., watching appealing person buy products.
- Name-calling
- Uses negative labels or stereotypes to create prejudice.
- Non Sequitur
- Logical fallacy where conclusion does not follow from argument.
- Obfuscation
- Deliberately vague generalities for audience interpretation, forgoing judgment.
- Oversimplification
- Using favorable generalities for simple answers to complex problems.
- Paltering
- Actively using selective truthful statements to mislead.
- Pens\u00e9e Unique
- Enforced reduction of discussion with overly simplistic phrases.
- Plain Folks
- Portrays the propagandist as being "of the people," relatable to the average person.
- Presenting Opinions as Facts
- States beliefs as if they were proven truths.
- Product Placement
- Subtly features branded products in media.
- Quotes out of Context
- Selective editing changing meanings.
- Rationalization
- Using vague, pleasant phrases to justify questionable acts or beliefs.
- Red Herring
- Introduces irrelevant information to distract.
- Reductio ad Hitlerum
- Rejects an idea by associating it with a group or person the audience despises.
- Repetition
- Repeating symbols or slogans for audience memory.
- Scapegoating
- Blames an individual or group for problems.
- Semantic Satiation
- Repeating damaging words for trivial accusations to normalize and dismiss impact.
- Slogans
- Brief, striking phrases for emotional appeals.
- Smears
- Efforts to damage reputation by negative propaganda.
- Snob Appeal
- Suggests using a product will make one part of an elite group.
- Stereotyping
- Arousing prejudices by labeling as feared or undesirable.
- Straw Man
- Misrepresenting opponent's position to refute a superficially similar proposition.
- Symbols
- Uses culturally significant symbols to evoke emotions.
- Testimonial
- Uses endorsements from well-known figures or experts.
- Third Party Technique
- Using seemingly independent sources to deliver premeditated message.
- Thought-terminating Clich\u00e9
- Common phrases to quell cognitive dissonance.
- Thought-terminating Cliché
- A short, generic phrase that discourages critical thought and ends discussion.
- Threat / Intimidation
- Announces or implies harm to coerce or to signal the fate of a target group.
- Transfer
- Links a concept with something respected (or disrespected) to transfer feelings.
- Unstated Assumption
- Repeatedly implying concept without explicit statement for credibility.
- Us-versus-them Framing
- Frames an issue as a conflict between an in-group and a hostile out-group, discouraging nuance.
- Virtue Words
- Words producing positive image, e.g., peace, hope, freedom.
- Whataboutism
- Responds to criticism by pointing out similar behavior in the accuser.
Several summaries in the reference list are adapted from Wikipedia's Propaganda techniques, available under CC BY-SA 4.0. The in-depth guides are our own.